I thought I'd give a bit of a rundown on the
debate between myself and Mike Paget on 'Which makes more sense, atheism or Christianity?'

First of all, I'd like to thank the
AFA for giving me the opportunity to represent them once again. To find out more about the AFA, you can check out their
website or
become a member.
In preparation, I had read some books by
Michael Shermer,
Christopher Hitchens etc. and was sent a link to a
great archive of mp3s of debates, including William Lane Craig vs
Robert Price,
Vic Stenger,
Paul Kurtz.
Lennox vs Dawkins,
Michael Licona vs Dan Barker, and
heaps more.
But as for the debate itself, I think it was a good night and everyone that came would have been a little challenged. I was
incredibly nervous before hand, especially when the seats had all been filled and there were just as many people standing as there were sitting. I couldn't estimate how many there were, but the theater was packed like sardines, with people sitting in the aisles and on the floor at the front, standing at the back and in the corridor. It was terrific to see so many people interested in thinking about these issues.

We will get video and audio of the debate up asap (they couldn't give us the MP3 afterwards as they had agreed to) as we had many
Sydney Atheists members recording in various formats. It's now just a case of finding someone who captured the whole lot, (most people's devices failed in the last 10 minutes due to the presence of an interactionalist deity who must have thought it worth his time to turn up just in case Mike proved his existence, allowing him to finally come out of hiding... or through random chance operating against our favour) and making it available for download.
If you have recordings from the night, please contact me at criticalmass@live.com.au

I was much more nervous about the questions from the floor, and to make matters worse, it was ridiculously hot and I was sweating like a pig by the time they came around. The questions weren't too bad, but I don't think I answered them as well as I could have, had I been given some preparation time. I found question time to be the most challenging, as I prefer to think things out and prepare my arguments, rather than thinking on my feet, but having had the experience I will be working on building up my answers to the types of questions people are likely to ask.

Afterwards, there were heaps of people that came up and congratulated me, and a lot less that wanted to argue with me.
It was a terrific experience to be involved in this debate. Each time I get to do one of these things I feel terribly under-prepared, especially so as this was my first time speaking in front of a crowd, but pushing myself has the benefit of improving my knowledge on the subjects. I look forward to my next opportunity to do something, but for now I have a brand new puppy to play with...